Home | Search | Help
OST by Number | OST by Order | OST by Carrier | OST by Subject | OST by Day
OIA by Carrier/Subject | OIA by Day | FAA by Number | FAA by Subject | FAA by Day
Carrier Financials | Charter Office | Answer/Reply Calendar
Updated:
OST-2007-27404 - Aer Lingus et al v. Los Angeles World Airports
OST-2007-27331 - Alaska Airlines, et al v. Los Angeles World Airports
OST-1995-474 - Recommended Decision of the ALJ (November 22, 1995)
|
Aer Lingus Group plc; Air Pacific; Air Tahiti NUI; All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd.; Asiana Airlines, Inc.; British Airways Plc; Cathay Pacific Airways Limited; China Airlines Ltd.; China Eastern Airlines; China Southern Airlines Company Limited; Compania Mexicana de Aviacion, S.A. de C.V.; Deutsche-Lufthansa AG; EL AL israel Airlines Ltd.; EVA Airways Corp.; Japan Airlines International Co., Ltd.; Korean Airlines Co. Ltd.; Lan Airlines S.A.; Philippine Airlines, Inc.; Qantas Airways Limited; Singapore Airlines Limited; Swiss International Air Lines Ltd. and Thai Airways International Public Co. Ltd. v. Los Angeles World Airports, Los Angeles Board of Airport Commisioners, and The City of Los Angeles, California February 23, 2007 Joint Complaint in Opposition to New Terminal Charges at Los Angeles International Airport - 1235 Pages
This Complaint raises the core issue of whether the Airport may raise the fees of the Tom Bradley International Terminal Airlines, ostensibly to cover its costs, when the Airport is more than covering its costs with the charges currently in place, would record more than $47 million in additional (or incremental) operating profit after the increases take efffect, has a substantial funding surplus, and has not established how or when the additional funds will be used except to finance unspecified future capital projects. Counsel:Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates, James Weiss, 202-628-1700, jim.weiss@klgates.com |
|||