Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day


OST-99-5581

Mobile Airport Authority and Atlantic Coast Airlines, Inc.

OST-99-5581 April 22, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Joint Application for an Exemption

WordPerfect
Scanned Copy

High Density Rule - Chicago O'Hare
    Exhibit 1: Top O&D Market from Chicago O'Hare without Nonstop Service (Under 1500 Miles)  
    Exhibit 2Markets Gaining Single Connecting Online Service  
    Exhibit 3Markets Gaining Service  
    Exhibit 4UAL vs. AAL RJ Status Summary  
    Exhibit 5Traffic, Revenue and Expense Forecast First 12 Months of Service  
    Service List  

Despite Mobile's economic strength and growth, its air service is dominated by a single carrier -- Delta Airlines. Eighty five percent of Mobile's O&D traffic is captured by Delta, with the majority moving over the Atlanta hub. Continental is a distant second with 9% of the market (flowing traffic over Houston) and Northwest with 6% (with nonstop service to Memphis). Domination of the Mobile market for air service by a single carrier has limited Mobile's access to the air transport market and produced only very limited competition in the Mobile market for air service. ACA's offer to provide twice daily regional jet service to Chicago's O'Hare Airport is pro-competitive and will open the Mobile market to United's network of domestic and international destinations.

Counsel:  Bagileo Silverberg, Robert Silverberg, 202-944-3300


Mobile Airport Authority and Atlantic Coast Airlines
Charleston County Aviation Authority and Atlantic Coast Airlines
Community of Savannah/Hilton Head

OST-99-5581
OST-99-5583
OST-98-3603
May 6, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Consolidated Answer of American Eagle Airlines High Density Rule - Chicago O'Hare

As we pointed out in our application in OST-99-5587, American's network at Chicago (American Airlines and American Eagle) is at a significant slot disadvantage compared to United's network at Chicago (United Air Lines and its United Express affiliates, including Air Wisconsin, Great Lakes Airlines, Atlantic Coast, and Trans States Airlines). United's network has access to a total of 1,052 O'Hare slots, while American's network has access to 916, resulting in a United network advantage of 136 daily slots, or 68 daily roundtrip services. In the interest of fostering two-carrier hub competition at O'Hare, the Department should not grant any additional exemption slots to use by United-affiliated carriers at O'Hare until American and American Eagle have achieved slot parity

Counsel:  American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647, carl_nelson@amrcorp.com


Charleston County Aviation Authority and Atlantic Coast Airlines
Mobile Airport Authority and Atlantic Coast Airlines

OST-99-5583
OST-99-5581
May 12, 1999 pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Consolidated Reply of the Joint Applicants High Density Rule - Charleston/Mobile-Chicago O'Hare document.gif (123 bytes)HTML

It is compelling that Eagle virtually ignores these considerations in its answer to the joint applications. In these applications, the parties noted the fact that the Charleston and Mobile markets lacked nonstop O'Hare service and that these markets were logical candidates for the grant of slot exemptions based on their respective size and market potential. */ In addition, ACA presented a traffic forecast and profit and loss statement. Eagle made no attempt to rebut these facts and arguments. Its only response was to incorrectly focus on hub carrier competition at O'Hare. Perhaps Eagle is distracted by this competition issue and for this reason it failed to successfully market its O'Hare Shreveport and O'Hare-Montgomery service for which slots were awarded to it by exemption. Whatever the reason for Eagle's termination of Shreveport and Montgomery service, it is no answer to the ACA/Charleston/Mobile applications to ask that they be denied on grounds that are irrelevant to the DOT's consideration of the joint requests.

Counsel:  Bagileo Silverberg, Robert Silverberg, 202-944-3300


Mobile Airport Authority and Atlantic Coast Airlines, Inc.

OST-99-5581 May 14, 1999
Docketed June 3, 1999
Re:  Letter of Mobile Airport Authority High Density Rule - Chicago O'Hare

Letter regarding a meeting discussing Mobile's need for Chicago service and its Chicago O'Hare slot exemption application

By:  G. Bay Haas, Executive Director


American Eagle Airlines, Inc.
Mobile Airport Authority-Atlantic Coast Airlines
Huntsville-Madison County Airport Authority
Greater Baton Rouge Airport District
Charleston County Aviation Authority-Atlantic Coast Airlines
National Airlines, Inc.

Order 99-7-17
OST-99-5587
OST-99-5959
OST-99-5581
OST-99-5533
OST-99-5532
OST-99-5583
OST-99-5521
Issued July 27, 1999
Served July 27, 1999
Order Amending Allocation of Slot Exemptions at Chicago O'Hare Airport and Inviting New Applications

HTML

Exemptions/Slots Chicago O'Hare

By this order the Department is amending its actions in Orders 98-4-21 and 98-9-24 by reallocating eight of the Chicago O'Hare Airport slot exemptions that were authorized to American Eagle in those orders. Specifically, slot exemptions that were previously designated for American Eagle to provide nonstop regional jet service to Montgomery, AL, and Shreveport, LA, are withdrawn and are redesignated for implementation of nonstop regional jet service between O'Hare and Baton Rouge, LA (two slot exemptions for American Eagle), Huntsville, AL (three slot exemptions for American Eagle) and Mobile, AL (three slot exemptions for Atlantic Coast Airlines). The reallocation of these slot exemptions is conditioned on their being used solely for implementation of service in the designated markets.

By:  Brad Mims


Atlantic Coast Airlines

OST-99-5581 September 15, 1999 Re: Order 99-7-17 Non-stop Service Chicago O'Hare- Mobile, AL

Counsel:  Silverberg Goldman, Robert Silverberg, 202.944.3300


Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day