Home | Search | Help
OST by Number | OST by Order | OST by Carrier | OST by Subject | OST by Day
OIA by Carrier/Subject | OIA by Day | FAA by Number | FAA by Subject | FAA by Day
Carrier Financials | Charter Office | Answer/Reply Calendar


OST-1998-4854

1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Proceeding / American Airlines, Inc. / US Airways, Inc. / Delta Air Lines, Inc. / Tower Air, Inc.

Order 98-12-3
OST-98-4854
OST-98-4806
OST-98-4809
OST-98-4757
OST-98-4808
Issued and Served December 3, 1998 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Order Instituting Proceeding 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
    Appendix A:  Evidence Request  

The new rights for U.S. carriers to serve Italy become effective April 1, 1999. As we stated in our notice soliciting applications, given this date, we intend to process this case on an expedited procedural schedule to ensure that the selected carrier will be in a position to commence services as soon as the route rights become available. To this end, we will make the DOT Information Responses available immediately. We are establishing the following procedural schedule for other submissions in this case:  

By:  Charles Hunnicutt


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case / Information Responses

document.gif (123 bytes)Summary Chart of Carrier's Information Responses

OST-98-4854 December 7, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Information Response of American Airlines 1999 US-Italy Combination

Counsel:  American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647

OST-98-4854 December 7, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Information Response of Continental Airlines 1999 US-Italy Combination

Counsel:  Crowell Moring, Lorraine Halloway, 202-624-2538

OST-98-4854 December 7, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Information Response of Delta Air Lines 1999 US-Italy Combination

Counsel:  Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202-663-8060

OST-98-4854 December 7, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Information Response of Trans World Airlines 1999 US-Italy Combination

Counsel:  TWA and Richard Fahy

OST-98-4854 December 7, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Information Response of United Air Lines 1999 US-Italy Combination

Counsel:  Kirkland Ellis, Jeffrey Manley, 202-879-5000

OST-98-4854 December 7, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Information Response of US Airways 1999 US-Italy Combination

Counsel:  US Airways and O'Melveny Myers, Joel Burton, 202-383-5300


1999 U.S. - Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 December 8, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Answer of Delta Air Lines to Motion to Strike of US Airways 1999 US-Italy

Delta's answer was specifically solicited by the Department's Notice and the contents of the Answer represent legitimate adversarial comment. In any event, US Airway's motion is now moot in light of Order 98-12-3 and should be rejected.

Counsel:  Delta and Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202-663-8060

OST-98-4854 November 30, 1998 Greater O'Hare Association of Industry and Commerce - Letter in Support of American
OST-98-4854 November 25, 1998 Mid-America Sales Co. - Letter in Support of American
OST-98-4854 November 30, 1998 Midwest Aviation Coalition - Letter in Support of American
OST-98-4854 November 24, 1998 Lyric Opera of Chicago - Letter in Support of American
OST-98-4854 December 2, 1998 Visit Illinois - Letter in Support of American
OST-98-4854 November 23, 1998 Joint Civic Committee of Italian Americans - Letter in Support of American

U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 December 3, 1998 Aurora Area Convention & Tourism Council - Letter in Support of American Airlines 1999 US-Italy

By:  Aurora Area Convention & Tourism Council Sue Vos Executive Director


1999 U.S. - Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 December 2, 1998 The Cook County Economic Development Advisory Committee - Letter in Support  
OST-98-4854 November 25, 1998 Broward County Aviation Department - Letter in Support  
OST-98-4854 December 3, 1998 Chicago Hilton and Towers - Letter in Support  
OST-98-4854 December 3, 1998 Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company - Letter in Support  
OST-98-4854 December 3, 1998 Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau, Inc. - Letter in Support  
OST-98-4854 December 3, 1998 Continental Air Transpsort Co., Inc. - Letter in Support  
OST-98-4854 December 1, 1998 Hoffman Estates Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Letter in Support  
OST-98-4854 December 1, 1998 Chicago Federation of Labor AFL-CIO - Letter in Support  
OST-98-4854 December 4, 1998 McDonough Association Inc. - Letter in Support  

1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 December 14, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Re:  Application of Tower Air 1999 US-Italy Combination

Tower Air has decided not to persue the above-referenced application that it filed for US-Italy authority and frequency allocation.

Counsel:  Hewes Gelband, Stephen Gelband, 202-337-6200


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

Continental and TWA Did Not File Exhibits

OST-98-4854 December 16, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Direct Exhibits of American Airlines - Exhibit Index 1999 US-Italy Combination  
    AA-101:  Narrative   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
  Added Dec 17th American Airlines Exhibits Page    

Counsel:  American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647, carl_nelson@amrcorp.com

OST-98-4854 December 16, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Direct Exhibits of The City of Chicago - Exhibit Index 1999 US-Italy Combination  
    ORD-DT-1:  Testimony of Douglas Wilson   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
  Added Dec 17th City of Chicago Exhibits Page    

Counsel:  Chicago and Winthrop Stimson

OST-98-4854 December 16, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Direct Exhibits of Delta Air Lines - Exhibit Index 1999 US-Italy Combination  
    DL-T-1:  Direct Testimony of Frederick Reid   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
    DL-T-2:  Narrative to The Direct Exhibits   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
  Added Dec 17th Delta Air Lines Exhibits Page    

Counsel:  Delta and Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202-663-8000, robert_cohn@shawpittman.com

OST-98-4854 December 16, 1998
Added Dec 17th
pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Direct Exhibits of Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, The City of Atlanta and The State of Georgia - Exhibit Index 1999 US-Italy Combination
    ATL-100:  Introduction and Summary    
    Georgia and Atlanta Parties Exhibits Page    

 

OST-98-4854 December 16, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Direct Exhibits of The City of Philadelphia - Exhibit Index 1999 US-Italy Combination  
    Philadelphia T-1:   Testimony of Gov Thomas Ridge   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
    Philadelphia T-2:  Testimony of Lynn Fields   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
    Philadelphia 100:  Narrative to 100 Series Exhibits   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
  Added Dec 17th City of Philadelphia Exhibits Page    

Counsel:  GKMG, Morris Garfinkle

OST-98-4854 December 16, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Direct Exhibits of US Airways - Exhibit Index 1999 US-Italy Combination  
    US-T-1:  Testimony of Stephen Wolf, Chairman   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
    US-T-2:  Testimony of N Bruce Ashby, Sr VP Planning   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
  Added Dec 17th US Airways Exhibits Page    

Counsel:  US Airways and O'Melveny Myers, Joel Burton


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 December 18, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)City of Philadelphia Motion for Leave to File and Unauthorized Document 1999 US-Italy  
    Philadelphia T-3:  Testimony of Edward G. Rendell, Mayor of Philadelphia   document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
    Revised Table of Contents    

No party is prejudiced by the late or acceptance of the Mayor's testimony. The Mayor's testimony does not contain any information that is not already addressed in Philadelphia's Direct Exhibits.

Wherefore, the City of Philadelphia, Division of Aviation respectfully requests that pursuant to Part §302.18, the Department grant the motion to file an unauthorized document and accept Mayor Rendell's testimony.

Counsel:  GKMG Consulting Services, Inc., Howard Kass, 202.342.5201


1998 US-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 December 23, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Re:  US-Italy Letters in Support of Delta from Members of Congress

Enclosed for filing in the captioned proceeding are letters from members of the Georgia Congressional Delegation and from Congressman Bill McCollum in support of the selection of Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Counsel:  Shaw Pittman, Kathreine Aldrich, 202.663.8007


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

All Rebuttal ExhibitsAdded January 4th

OST-98-4854 December 30, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Rebuttal Exhibits of American Airlines 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
  Exhibits Added 1/4/99 Service List  
    Index to Exhibits  
    Exhibits  

Counsel:  American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647

OST-98-4854 December 30, 1998 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Rebuttal Exhibits of The City of Chicago 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
    Exhibit ORD-100R - Chicago is Served by More Carriers Than Atlanta or Philadelphia  
    Exhibit ORD-121R - Delta Air Lines Estimates That the Chicago-Rome Market is Fully Seven Times Larger Than Atlanta-Rome  
    Exhibit ORD-125 - Catchment Area Analysis  
    Exhibit ORD-126 - Incremental Impact of DL ATL-FCO Versus AA ORD-FCA  

Counsel:  Chicago and Winthrop Stimson

OST-98-4854 December 30, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Rebuttal Exhibits of Delta Air Lines 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
  Exhibits Added 1/4/99 Service List  
    Index to Exhibits  
    Exhibit DL-RT-1 Rebuttal Testimony
    Exhibit DL-R-101 thru DL-R-115  
    Exhibit DL-R-117 thru DL-R-152  
    Exhibit DL-R-153 thru DL-R-156  
    Re:  Letters in Support from Various State and Local Government Officials and Civic Parties pt.1 | pt. 2 DL 500 Series

Counsel:  Delta and Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn

OST-98-4854 December 30, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Revised Direct Exhibits and Rebuttal Exhibits of The Georgia & Atlanta Parties -- Narrative 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
  Exhibits Added 1/4/99 Index to Exhibits  
    Exhibit ATL-R-100 Series  
    Exhibit ATL-R-200 Series  
    Exhibit ATL-R-300 Series  
    Exhibit ATL-R-400 Series  

By:  Kimberly Conroy, Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce

OST-98-4854 December 30, 1998 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Rebuttal Exhibits of The City of Philadelphia, Division of Aviation (pt1) | (pt2) 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

Counsel:  GKMG, Morris Garfinkle, 202-342-5263

OST-98-4854 December 30, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Rebuttal Exhibits of US Airways -- Index to Exhibits 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
  Exhibits Added 1/4/99 Exhibit US-RT-1 Rebuttal Testimony
    Exhibit US-R-100 Series  
    Exhibit US-R-200 Series  
    Exhibit US-R-300 Series  
    Exhibit US-R-400 Series  

Counsel:  US Airways and O'Melveny Myers, Joel Burton


1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 January 4, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Supplement to DL-500 Additional Letters in Support from Government Officials

Counsel:  Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202.663.8000


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 January 12, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Re:  Letters in Support of Delta's Service Proposal 1999 US-Italy Service Case
 

Letters in Support Added 1/13

Letters in Support  

Counsel:  Delta and Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202-663-8060, robert_cohn@shawpittman.com


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 January 13, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Brief of American Airlines

Scanned Version

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

Counsel:  American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647, carl_nelson@amrcorp.com

OST-98-4854 January 13, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Brief of The City of Chicago

Microsoft Word 97 Format

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

Counsel:  Chicago and Winthrop Stimson, Kenneth Quinn

OST-98-4854 January 13, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Brief of Delta Air Lines

Scanned Version
Microsoft Word 97 Format

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
    Attachment A:  Delta Will  Carry More Passengers from the Underserved Southeast than An Other Applicant  
    Attachment B:  Delta Will Carry More Passengers from the Underserved Southern Tier Than Any Other Applicant  

Counsel:  Delta and Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202-663-8060

OST-98-4854 January 13, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Brief of The Georgia & Atlanta Parties

Microsoft Word 97 Format

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

Counsel:  Bill Alberger

OST-98-4854 January 13, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Brief of The City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation

Scanned Version
Microsoft Word 97 Format

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

Counsel:  Philadelphia and GKMG

OST-98-4854 January 13, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Brief of US Airways

Scanned Version

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
    Appendix A:  Delta Air Lines Announces Expansion of Service to Europe in Summer 1999 - Press Release  

Counsel:  US Airways and O'Melveney Myers, Joel Burton


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 January 19, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Re:  Letters in Support of US Airways' Service Proposal 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
 

Letters Added 1/21

Letters in Support:  Pt.1 | Pt.2  

Counsel:  O'Melveney Myers, Joel Burton


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 February 2, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Re:  Letters in Support of Delta Air Lines' Service Proposal 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

Enclosed for filing in the captioned proceeding are letters in support of the selection of Delta Air Lines, Inc. from Sen. Trent Lott; Sen. John Breaux; Senators Bob Graham and Connie Mack; James H. Hodges, Governor of South Carolina; Glenda E. Hood, Mayor of Orlando, FL; Jim Marshall, Mayor of Macon, GA; and John C. Gunny M.D., Honorary Consul of Italy for the States of Georgia and South Carolina.

Counsel:  Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202-663-8000

Editor's Note: There are numerous other Letters in Support for all the other carriers - please refer to the DOT's DMS Web Site for letters not contained here.

http://dms.dot.gov/search/


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

Order 99-2-27
OST-98-4854
Issued and Served February 23, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Order to Show Cause

Scanned Version

US-Italy Combination Service Case document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
    Appendix A:  Summary of US-Italy Proposals    

By this Order, we tentatively select Delta Air Lines to operate seven weekly frequencies in the Atlanta-Rome market beginning April 1, 1999, and tentatively select US Airways for backup authority.  Against this background, the record supports a tentative finding that we can derive major public benefits from an award in this case by providing for new gateway services to Italy. This consideration strongly supports Delta's Atlanta-Rome application because only Delta would open a new gateway to Italy, and only Delta would permit the Southern region of the country to enjoy the benefits of U.S.-carrier gateway services. Delta would also provide the most significant behind gateway service benefits and enhance competition in the U.S.-Italy market. In these circumstances, we have tentatively determined that Delta's proposal offers the best use of the route authority at issue. While American and US Airways have submitted attractive proposals, their proposals do not match the public benefits that would be available under Delta's

By:  Patrick Murphy


U.S. - Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 Docketed February 24, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Ex Parte Letter to Marvin E. Strong, Jr. U.S. - Italy

Ex Parte Letter to Marvin E. Strong, Jr. from Charles A. Hunnicutte re Support of Delta's application for Atlanta,
Georgia-Rome, Italy service.

By:  Charles Hunnicutt

Note:  See DOT's Site for Numerous Other Letters in this Docket


1999 U.S. - Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 February 25, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Comments of US Airways, Inc. 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Proceeding

This case has been processed on an expedited basis so as to enable the selected carrier to commence operations as soon as possible in order to operate a successful summer season. In these circumstances, US Airways believes that it is important to-maximize the value of these scarce transitional rights that the U.S. Government has secured from Italy. The most effective way to do this, consistent with the needs of the travelling public and Delta's ability to operate a viable summer service in competition with foreign flag carriers, is for the Department to grant the authority immediately to Delta to initiate Atlanta-Rome service. By granting final authority to Delta without further delay, the Department will enable Delta to begin marketing its service, thus maximizing the public benefits of the new Italy route authority.

Counsel:  O'Melveny & Meyers L.L.P., Joel Stephen Burton, 202.383.5300

OST-98-4854 February 25, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Emergency Motion of Delta Air Lines for Pendente Lite Authority

Scanned Version

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Proceeding

There is substantial Department precedent to support Delta's request  for pendente lite authority. Thus, in the U.S.-Lima Combination Service Proceeding, the Department granted Miami-Lima authority on a pendente litebasis finding 'special circumstances" based on '`the imminent peak travelseason". Order 95-7-23. It is noteworthy that the Lima award was made at theinception of the proceeding and before a show cause order issued. In the U.S.London 1993 Route Proceeding (Order 93-11-13), the Department granted American pendente lite exemption authority to serve Nashville-London and Raleigh/Durham-London, at the same time it issued a show cause order. Seealso, Order 98-2-12, U.S.-Japan Interim Frequency Allocation Proceeding, granting pendente lite authority to Delta, Continental, and American to implement new U.S.-Japan nonstop service; Order 95-2-52 (U.S.-Toronto), Order 95-2-53 (U.S.-Vancouver), Order 95-2-54 (U.S.-Montreal); Order 96-245 (U.S.-Toronto Second Year Service Proceeding); Order 96-5-21, (U.S.Toronto); Order 96-11-11 (U.S.-Toronto Third Year Service proceeding)

Counsel: Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202.663.8060


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 Served February 26, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Notice Shortening Answer Period Delta's Pendente Lite Emergency Motion

By:  Paul Gretch


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 March 3, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Joint Statement of Ojections of City of Chicago and American Airlines

Microsoft Word 97 Format

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Proceeding

The Department’s tentative determination that Delta’s Atlanta-Rome proposal provides "much greater public benefits" than American’s Chicago-Rome proposal flies in the face of (i) the clear and compelling evidence in this proceeding that American’s Chicago-Rome proposal will provide far greater new service and competitive benefits than those provided by either Delta or US Airways, and (ii) the Department’s previous determination in the 1996 U.S.-Italy Service Proceeding that Atlanta-Rome service by Delta would not, because of Delta’s existing and competing New York-Rome service, provide significant new service or competitive bene-fits. Likewise, the Department’s tentative selection of US Airways for backup authority in the Philadelphia-Milan market, because Philadelphia is a "developing transatlantic gateway," is flatly at odds with the overwhelming record evidence that it is Rome, not Milan, which requires additional service. It is beyond question that American’s Chicago-Rome proposal, to restore service in a well-established market, is superior to that of either Delta or US Airways. The De-partment should reconsider its tentative selection of Delta, and instead award the primary authority in this proceeding to American as soon as possible so that American can begin Chicago- Rome service this summer.

Counsel:  Winthrop Stimson, Kenneth Quinn, quinnk@winstim.com for Chicago / American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647, carl_nleson@amrcorp.com

OST-98-4854 Dated March 2, 1999
Filed March 3, 1999
pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Answer of the Georgia and Atlanta Parties

Microsoft Word 97 Format

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Proceeding

We appreciate and applaud the filing last week by US Airways, Inc., indicating that in order to maximize the value of these scarce transitional rights, the Department should move quickly to grant the authority to Delta to initiate the Atlanta-Rome service. US Airways recognized that this would allow Delta to begin marketing its new service, thus maximizing the public benefits of the new Italy service.

By:  Bill Alberger


Delta Air Lines, Inc.

OST-98-4854 Filed February 25, 1999
Issued March 4, 1999
pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Notice of Action Taken Atlanta - Rome

Exemption under 49 U.S C. 40109 to the extent necessary for pendente lite authority to permit Delta to commence the sale and marketing of Atlanta-Rome nonstop service, pending final award of Department authority to serve the Atlanta-Rome market.

By Order 99-2-27, the Department tentatively selected Delta to provide nonstop service between Atlanta and Rome in the 1999 U.S. -Italy Combination Service Case. Delta requests immediate issuance of pendente lite authority to enable Delta to continence the sale and marketing of Atlanta-Rome nonstop service for the coming summer season, pending issuance of a final order in this proceeding. Delta maintains that special circumstances warrant the issuance of pendente lite authority' saying that awaiting issuance of a final decision in this case would place Delta at a competitive disadvantage because other U.S.-Italy carriers are currently selling their peak travel season U.S.-Italy services.

By:  Paul Gretch


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 March 8, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Answer of The Georgia and Atlanta Parties to Joint Statement of Objections of American Airlines and The City of Chicago

Scanned Version
Microsoft Word 97 Format

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

As a last gasp, Chicago and American attempt to rely on language from the 1996 U.S.-Italy Proceeding to the effect that it is somehow inconsistent with the Department's reasoning in Order 99-2-27. In 1996, the other two applicants were "new entrant" carriers. Neither US Air (its name at the time) nor Northwest had service to Italy. Both other applicants today already serve Italy, so the issues are far from similar. Further, the Delta proposal in this case is quite different from its proposal in 1996. Like all of the other arguments offered by Chicago and American, this one does not work either. The Department has already fairly considered all of these matters, and need only confirm the wisdom of its tentative decision in the Show Cause Order and award Delta daily nonstop service between Atlanta and Rome.

Counsel:  Bill Alberger, 703-461-3791


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

OST-98-4854 March 10, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Answer of Delta Air Lines to Objections

Microsoft Word 97 Format
Scanned Version

1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

The Objectors try to distract attention away from the superiority of Delta's service proposal by arguing that Chicago allegedly has a larger catchment area than Atlanta. This argument is misplaced. The size of Chicago's catchment area, however large it may be, does not accurately reflect, to use the Objectors' own words, "the real measure of public benefits" because it does not establish "how many passengers will actually use the service."

Counsel:  Delta and Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202-663-8060


1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case

Order 99-4-21
OST-98-4854
Issued April 27, 1999
Served May 4, 1999
pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Final Order 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case

Our analysis, however, produces a different conclusion as to which proposal will provide the greatest public benefits. As we have pointed out, Chicago and Philadelphia, the other two cities at issue, already enjoy nonstop service to Italy. Atlanta does not. Where U.S.-carrier rights are restricted, as they are here, our long-standing goal has been to insure gateway access to the foreign market to as many U.S. cities as possible. For this reason, the opening of a new U.S. gateway for international service has been a significant consideration in carrier selection cases. In the U.S.-Italy market, we note that the expansion of U.S. gateway services, including American’s Chicago-Milan service, United’s Washington, D.C.-Milan service, and US Airways’ Philadelphia-Rome service, has resulted in significant increases in U.S.-Italy traffic, facilitating the development of the market and providing valuable gateway access to millions of U.S. travelers.

In this case, only Delta would offer new gateway service to Italy and, thus, only the selection of Delta would maximize the public benefits from these newly available route rights, as the selection of new gateway service did in these previous cases involving expanded route rights in the U.S.-Italy market. While American’s proposed service would improve Chicago’s service to Italy, we are not persuaded that the incremental benefits of expanded service at Chicago outweigh the benefits of service from a totally new gateway, particularly where, as here, the connecting services available from Delta’s significant Atlanta network will, among all the applicants, afford the greatest number of cities their first service to Italy. In these circumstances, we remain convinced that adding Atlanta as a new gateway for U.S.-Italy service will provide the greatest public benefits from an award in this case.

By:  Bradely Mims


Home | Search | Help
OST by Number | OST by Order | OST by Carrier | OST by Subject | OST by Day
OIA by Carrier/Subject | OIA by Day | FAA by Number | FAA by Subject | FAA by Day
Carrier Financials | Charter Office | Answer/Reply Calendar