Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day


OST-98-4604

The Communities of the Virginia Peninsula

OST-98-4604 October 20, 1998 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Application for an Exemption
pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Application for an Exemption
High Density Rule, Newport News/Hampton-OHare
  Added 10/21 Service List  
    Exhibit 1:  The Virginia Peninsula Parties  
    Exhibit 2:  Slots Requested  
    PHF Geographical Attributes  
    ORF/RIC/PHF Passenger Traffic Statistics  
    Major Area Employers  
    MSA Growth Figures '90-'95  
    VA Retail Sales Report '92  
    VA Economic Growth Indicators  
    ATL O&D Passenger Share By Composite Airport (ORF, PHF, & RIC)  
    Newport News - Williamsburg O&D Traffic Growth  
    Population Growth Projections - VA Peninsula and Southside  
    PHF-ORD O&D/P&L Forecast - 3X Daily CRJ Service  

The Parties ask that the Department award slots so that United Express, American Eagle or another airline can start service Between O'Hare and Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport. If the slots are awarded to Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport, the civic and corporate Parties know that they can support service and not have to worry about having the slots transferred to other markets.

Counsel:  Ungaretti Harris, Edward Faberman, 202-778-4460


Communities of the Virginia Peninsula

OST-98-4604 November 2, 1998 pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Answer of Atlantic Coast Airlines High Density Rule, Chicago O'Hare

It would be grossly unfair to the Savannah/Hilton Head communities, which along with ACA, filed for relief from the High Density Airport Rule four months before the Virginia Parties acted to request similar relief were the Department to delay considering the merits of ACA's application or otherwise proceeding by giving comparative consideration to both requests. While ACA believes that any such comparative proceeding would demonstrate that service between Savannah/Hilton and O'Hare would generate greater public benefits than would service from Newport News/Williamsburg, it would nonetheless be inequitable not to first consider the application of those that were first to make a request for O'Hare access. DOT evaluation of subsequently filed applications should only be considered by the Department when the subsequent applicant makes a timely request for consolidation. Alternatively, the Virginia Parties should have answered the ACA application to the extent it objected to the grant of an exemption to permit ACA to provide regional jet service in the Savannah/Hilton Head O'Hare market. The Virginia Parties did neither.

Counsel:  Bagileo Silverberg, Robert Silverberg, 202-944-3300


The Communities of the Virginia Peninsula

OST-98-4604 November 4, 1998 pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Answer of United Air Lines Nonstop Service to Chicago O'Hare document.gif (123 bytes)HTML

United appreciates Newport News' desire for access to O'Hare. The instant application. however, cannot succeed in meeting that need. On both legal and policy grounds, the Department cannot find that the request of Newport News satisfies the standards of the authorizing legislation or of the important policy determinations that must accompany decisions to grant access to O'Hare under exceptional circumstances. On the basis of the foregoing, therefore, the application cannot be granted.

Counsel:  United and Kirkland Ellis, Jeffrey Manley, 202-879-5161, jeffrey_manley@kirkland.com


The Communities of The Virginia Peninsula

OST-98-4604 November 12, 1998 pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Response of The Communities of The Virginia Peninsula High Density Rule, Chicago O'Hare
    Exhibit A:  PHF-ORD Forecast/Cost Forecast  

By taking the action requested, the Department will be taking a giant step to bring the benefits of its policies to small and medium communities and will be helping the Virginia Peninsula determine its future. Such an action would provide the Virginia Peninsula with the engine of economic growth and job creation. Without Department action, those local efforts may stall. United states that awarding this exemption "would be to turn the clock back on deregulation." To the contrary, allowing one or two carriers to decide which communities will get competitive service will turn the clock back on deregulation.

Counsel:  Ungaretti Harris, Edward Faberman, 202-778-4460


The Communities of the Virginia Peninsula

OST-98-4604 December 1998 Letters in Support

There are numerous Letters in Support of the Application.  Please refer to the DOT Docket Management System for Complete Listing

High Density Rule- Chicago O'Hare

The Communities of VA Peninsula, Savannah, GA/Hilton Head, SC, Greenville/Spartanburg, SC and Aspen Mountain Airways

Order 99-3-12
OST-98-4604
OST-98-3603
OST-99-5130
OST-98-3671
Issued and Served March 16, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Order Reserving Slot Exemptions at Chicago O'Hare Airport

Scanned Copy

High Density Rule, Chicago O'Hare Slots document.gif (123 bytes)HTML

By this order the Department is establishing an experimental allocation of Chicago O'Hare Airport slot exemptions to be deployed by selected communities for the purpose of assisting those communities in acquiring nonstop air service to O'Hare. Specifically, we are reserving a total of three O'Hare slot exemptions each for the communities of Greenville/Spartanburg, South Carolina, and Savannah, Georgia/Hilton Head, South Carolina, for the provision of such service. The service must be provided with Stage 3 jet aircraft, and is limited to a 179-day period. We find that this at lion is in the public interest.

By:  Charles Hunnicutt


The Communites of the Virginia Peninsula

OST-98-4604 April 7, 1999 pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Application for an Exemption Non-Stop Service to Chicago O'Hare Airport
    Service List  

Counsel:  Ungaretti & Harris, Edward Faberman, for Peninsula Airport Commission, 202.639.7501


The Communities of The Virginia Peninsula

OST-98-4604 April 22, 1999 pdficon.gif (881 bytes)Answer of United Air Lines High Density Rule - Nonstop Service to Chicago O'Hare document.gif (123 bytes)HTML
    Attachment:   Letter from United to Bradley Mims and Patrick
Murphy dated 4/16/99
  document.gif (123 bytes)HTML

If the Department chooses to treat this submission as an application rather than an petition for reconsideration of Order 99-3-12, the Department should deny the application for the same reasons it was dismissed in Order 99-3-12. In that order, the Department stated that it was undertaking an experiment and therefore would "establish a one-time test to enable (DOT) to observe the extent to which the availability of slot exemptions assists non-airline parties in addressing their transportation needs." Order 99-3-12 at 3. The Department emphasized that it was limiting the experiment "in number and duration." Id. at 7. In commencing its experiment and making its award of exemptions to communities "for a temporary period of 179 days," the Department reviewed the "three pending applications" - of Greenville/Spartanburg, Savannah/Hilton Head and Newport News/Williamsburg - on the merits, under existing public interest guidelines, and selected the first two, dismissing the application of Newport News/Williamsburg. The Department specifically found that the record data "clearly demonstrate a more pressing case for the institution of direct O'Hare service for Savannah/Hilton Head and Greenville/Spartanburg than for Newport News." Order 99-3-12 at 7.

Counsel:  United and Kirkland Ellis, Jeffrey Manley, 202-879-5161, jeffrey_manley@kirkland.com


Establishment of Slot Exemptions Proceedings 

OST-95-277
OST-97-3086
OST-98-4647
OST-98-3603
OST-98-3982
OST-98-4424
OST-98-3550
OST-98-4346
OST-98-3603
OST-98-4604
OST-99-5153
OST-99-6731
OST-99-4979
OST-99-6683
OST-99-6547
OST-99-6654
OST-99-5532
OST-99-5533
OST-99-5475
OST-99-5614
OST-00-6957
OST-00-6996
OST-00-6970
OST-00-6838
OST-00-7175
OST-00-7176
OST-00-7177
OST-00-7178
OST-00-7179
OST-00-7180
OST-00-7181
OST-00-7182
Served April 14, 2000 Notice

HTML

Slot Exemptions

By:  Bradley Mims


Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day