Home | Search | Help
OST by Number | OST by Order | OST by Carrier | OST by Subject | OST by Day
OIA by Carrier/Subject | OIA by Day | FAA by Number | FAA by Subject | FAA by Day
Carrier Financials | Charter Office
FAA Docket for May 9, 2008
Updated:
Applications and Petitions: None
Answers and Replies:
ADSB Out Performance Requirements - Comments of Boeing and Rockwell-Collins
Orders and Notices:
None
Rules and Regulations:
None
Grant of Petitions:
None
ADSB Out Performance Requirements to Support ATC
January 28, 2008
Re: Comments of Rockwell-Collins
The FAA should develop a two-stage ADS-B mandate. The first stage is a forward-fit mandate of 2013 with somewhat relaxed performance requirements [i.e., NACp ≥ 7, NIC ≥ 6] from the final 2020 mandate requirements.
Re-assess plan to decommission TIS-B. There is a need for ASA applications to gap-fill missing traffic that is known about by other means of surveillance.
By: Rockwell-Collins, 319-295-3971, cwmcderm@rockwellcollins.com
March 21, 2008
Re: DOT Memo Showing Comments of Boeing
Boeing contends that ADSB can be implemented sooner (before 2020) by using a two-phased approach that makes use of existing equipment early. Specifically, Boeing states that the first phase should be limited to ADSB Out and the performance requirements should be reduced to those required for ADSB Out. Once this is accomplished, the FAA can focus on the development of ADSB In applications and their performance requirements. The second phase would include an ADSB In mandate when the standards are complete.
Boeing and the FAA discussed WAAS in relation to ADSB. In response to a discussion, the FAA clarified that the NPRM does not specify WAAS; it specifies performance requirements.
By: DOT