© Copyright 2001 Airline Information Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day
OST Docket Filings for January 27, 2003 |
Last Updated 01/27/03 07:27 PM
Applications and Renewals:
None
Answers and Replies:
EAS at Oshkosh, WI - Objections of Mesa Air and Wisconsin Airport Dept.
Kalitta - Re: Family Assistance Plan
Lan Ecuador - Answers of Continental and Northwest
Southeast - Designation of Agent
Notices of Action Taken:
ABSA - Brazil-US Renewal
Notices and Orders:
IATA - Notice of Approval of Agreements
Lynch v British Airways - Dismissing Complaint
| OST-03-14291 Undocketed |
January 15, 2003 | Answer of Continental Airlines | Ecuador-US / Wet-Lease to Lan Ecuador |
Barely
three months ago, Lan Ecuador applied in Docket
02-13661 for an exemption to conduct Ecuador-U.S. operations and requested a
waiver of the ownership and control provisions of the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral air
transport agreement to permit it to be 100% owned and almost entirely managed by
Chilean citizens. The Department denied Lan Ecuador's application, citing the
highlyrestrictive U.S.-Ecuador agreement and Lan Ecuador's extraordinary
ownership and control by Lan Chile and Chileans. (See Order
2002-12-15) Lan Ecuador is again applying for an ownership and control
waiver and an exemption to offer Ecuador-U.S. service despite continuing
restrictions in the U.S.-Ecuador agreement and Lan Chile's continuing influence
on Lan Ecuador notwithstanding hastily-made changes to its ownership and
management structure.
Even without Continental's aspirations to codeshare with Northwest, ownership and control issues posed by the applications of Lan Ecuador and Lan Chile demand the Department's careful and thorough review. Nevertheless, the Department should not begin further investigating the relationships between Lan Ecuador and Lan Chile until Ecuador commits to approve codesharing between U.S. airlines and their partners and grants Continental's request for authority to place the Northwest NW* code on Continental's U.S.-Ecuador flights.
Counsel: Continental and Crowell Moring, Bruce Keiner, 202-624-2500
| OST-03-14291 Undocketed |
January 27, 2003 | Answer of Northwest Airlines | Ecuador-US / Wet-Lease to Lan Ecuador |
| Service List |
When Lan Ecuador first applied for the same exemption authority and a waiver of the ownership and control provisions in the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral agreement, the Department denied those requests based on the extremely restrictive nature of the bilateral agreement with Ecuador and the substantial ownership and control of Lan Ecuador by Lan Chile and other Chilean interests.) Northwest opposed Lan Ecuador's original application because Northwest has long been concerned that the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral agreement does not permit same-country code sharing. While Lan Ecuador has apparently changed its ownership and management structure, Northwest is unaware that Ecuador's policy with respect to same-country codesharing has changed since the Department's December denial. At least until Ecuador commits to permitting codesharing between U.S. carriers, the Department should deny Lan Ecuador and Lan Chile authority to conduct the far more significant extra-bilateral cooperative working arrangements they have proposed with Lan Chile.
Northwest urges the Department to deny the renewed Lan Ecuador exemption application and the companion Lan Chile application for wet-lease authority at least until Ecuador permits U.S. carriers to engage in same-country codesharing on U.S. -Ecuador routes.
Counsel: Northwest, Megan Rosia, 202 843-3193
| OST-96-1372 | Filed January 2, 2003 Issued January 27, 2003 |
Notice of Action Taken | Brazil-U.S. |
Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the applicant to continue to conduct the following operations: A) scheduled, all-cargo services between any point or points in Brazil and the U.S. coterminal points New York/Atlanta/Miami/Orlando/Detroit/Houston/Chicago/Los Angeles/Washington, D.C./Baltimore/San Francisco/Boston/San Juan, via intermediate points; and B) charters, carrying property and mail, between a point or points in Brazil and a point or points in the United States, and other cargo charters, in accordance with the Department's regulations (14 CFR Part 212).
By: Paul Gretch
Essential Air Service at Oshkosh, Wisconsin
| OST-99-5712 | January 24, 2003 Docketed January 27, 2003 |
Objection and Motion of Stay of Mesa Air Group | 90-Day Notice to Terminate Essential Air Service at Oshkosh, Wisconsin |
It is the Department's longstanding program policy to base subsidy-per-passenger calculations on actual traffic, not carrier forecasts. To rely on carriers' passenger forecasts to determine communities' eligibility would be to abrogate our statutory obligations and turn over to the carriers the authority to determine which communities would remain in the program and which would be eliminated.
Air Midwest has prepared a final compensation request for service between Oshkosh and Chicago O'Hare in response to the Department's Order. to Community officials at Oshkosh, however, have indicated that service to Chicago Midway may better serve their interests. I 1 In light of this, Air Midwest is prepared to explore in good faith service options to the Midway hub. Air Midwest will also guarantee that its compensation requirement for Midway will be commensurate with the O'Hare final compensation requirement. As it is the Community's desire to transfer its service to Midway, Air Midwest requests that the Department consider service proposals to Midway as a viable alternative to service to O'Hare.
By: Mesa, Colleen O'Day
| OST-99-5712 | January 27, 2003 | Objection of Winnebago County, Wisconsin Airport Department | 90-Day Notice to Terminate Essential Air Service at Oshkosh, Wisconsin |
| Service List |
The Oshkosh community strongly supports service by Air Midwest to Midway and based on meetings with the carrier and its parent the Mesa Air Group, Inc., believes that Air Midwest has the desire and capability to make Oshkosh service a success. In support of Air Midwest, Wittman has agreed to provide necessary hangar space without charge to the carrier. In addition, Wittman is waiving both landing fees and fees for counter and office space. Moreover, to support the new service Wittman has pledged up to $100,000 in advertising support.
Counsel: Baker Hostetler, David Kirstein, 202 861-1756
Dr. Maureen Lynch v. British Airways
| Order 03-01-26 OST-02-12378 |
Issued and Served January 27, 2003 | Order Dismissing Complaint | Violations of Air Carrier Access Act of 1986 |
On review of the Complainant's petition, we see no reason to alter the determination in Order 2002-11-11 to dismiss her complaint. The Complainant concedes that she was late in arriving at the departure gate and has offered, as basis for a revision of our prior decision, only the bare assertion that she is not satisfied with the air carrier's explanation of the difficulty in bringing a wheelchair aboard the aircraft used on the flight. We do not believe that it is reasonable to impose further evidentiary requirements on the carrier absent a prima facia rebuttal showing by the Complainant which would call into question the carrier's submissions that on their face are credible. The Complainant has failed to make such an initial showing. We therefore affirm the prior decision to dismiss the complaint and find that further review of this matter is not in the public interest.
By: Rosalind Knapp
International Air Transport Association
| OST-02-14260 OST-02-14298 |
Filed January 14, 2003 Filed January 16, 2003 Approved January 21, 2003 |
Notice | Approval of Agreements |
By: Paul Gretch
| OST-96-1960 | January 27, 2003 | Re: Family Assistance Plan | Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Plan |
Counsel: Sher Blackwell, Donald Kassilke, 202 463-2506
| OST-02-12555 | January 13, 2003 Docketed January 27, 2003 |
Designation of Agent | Designation of Agent for Service of Notice, Process, Orders, Decisions and Requirements |
Counsel: Pillsbury Winthrop, Josh Romanow
Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day
© Copyright 2001 Airline Information Research, Inc. All rights reserved.