© Copyright 2001 Airline Information Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day
OST Docket Filings for January 18, 2001 |
Last Updated 01/19/01 02:09 PM
Applications and Renewals:
Air Jamaica - Jamaica- Houston | Corporate Airlines - 90-Day EAS Notice at Burlington, IA | DHL Worldwide - Petition of UPS | IATA
Answers and Replies:
Air Excursions - Additional Information | Hong Kong Fifth Freedom All-Cargo - Reply of Polar
Sun Air Express - Compliance Disposition | Vietnam Airlines - Supplement | Wendell Ford - Re-Certification of US Airways Express Carriers
Notices of Action Taken:
American - Japan Codesharing Renewal | Islandsflug
Notices and Orders:
Deceptive Internet Practices - Notice | Foreign Air Carrier Reporting Requirements - Final Order
Los Angeles-San Jose del Cabo Exemption Proceeding - Final Order
| Order 01-1-13 OST-00-8393 |
Issued January 16, 2001 Served January 18, 2001 |
Foreign Air Carrier Permits and Exemptions | |
| Appendix: Current Department Authority Being Amended By This Order |
By this order, the Department finds that it is in the public interest to modify the proposals announced in Show-Cause Order 2000-11-25 concerning the reporting requirement on certain foreign air carriers in connection with a new multilateral agreement involving the United States and various APEC members, and to finalize the requirement as modified.
The purpose of our show-cause order was to provide a fair and effective vehicle for allowing us to exercise that right. Therefore, we tentatively found that it was in the public interest for the Department to be informed of specified changes in the ownership of the voting stock of the foreign air carriers covered by the agreement, and that those foreign air carriers should provide the necessary information.
After carefully considering all matters of record, including all of the comments filed in response to our tentative decision, we have decided to affirm our initial determination that it is in the public interest for the foreign air carriers to provide the information we need to effectively
monitor the operation of the agreement provision at issue. We have also determined, however, that it is in the public interest to modify the proposed reporting requirement to meet many of the issues and concerns raised in response to the tentative decision.
By: Francisco Sanchez
| OST-01-8733 | January 18, 2001 | Jamaica- Houston , TX | |
| Attachment: Letter from Jamaican Embassy | |||
| Service List |
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109(c) and the Department's Rules of Practice, Air Jamaica Limited hereby applies for an exemption amending the list of U.S. points that it may serve under its permit authority so that it may provide scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail between the coterminal points Kingston and Montego Bay, Jamaica, on the one hand, and Houston, Texas, on the other. Air Jamaica's foreign air carrier permit, issued by Order 89-3-74, authorizes Air Jamaica to serve ten U.S. coterminal points, and it provides that these coterminal points may be changed by the Department, under assigned authority, upon Air Jamaica's application. Air Jamaica requests that the Department substitute Houston, Texas for San Francisco, California as one of the ten U.S. points. Air Jamaica desires to begin providing service between Jamaica and Houston on June 7, 2001.
Counsel: Hogan Hartson, George Carneal, 202.637.6546, gucarneal@hhlaw.com
| OST-99-4994 | Filed December 11, 2000 Issued January 18, 2001 |
U.S.- Japan Codesharing |
Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail between: (1) a point. or points in Japan and a point or points in the United States, either nonstop or via an intermediate point or points in third countries; (2) any two points in Japan, limited to traffic originating or terminating outside Japan; (3) a point or points in the United States and a point or points beyond the United States; and (4) a point or points in Japan and a point or points beyond Japan, an a blind-sector basis.
By: Paul Gretch
Corporate Airlines, Inc. d/b/a Trans World Express
| OST-01-8731 | January 18, 2001 | 90-Day Notice to Terminate EAS | |
| Service List |
At the time of the filing of this notice both Corporate Airlines, inc. (flying as Trans World Express), and Great Lakes Aviation, LTD. (flying as United Express) are providing scheduled air service at Burlington, Iowa. However, Great Lakes Aviation is scheduled to suspend its service to Chicago effective February 15, 2001.
Traffic results have been significantly below the levels needed, and as a result the revenues generated from the flights have not covered the costs of providing the service.
By: Charles Howell, 615.223.5644
| OST-01-8732 | January 18, 2001 | Registration of DHL Worldwide Express, Inc. as a Foreign Air Freight Forwarder Pursuant to 14 CFR 297 | |
| Appendix A: Letter from DOT to Counsel for DHL and Application | |||
| Appendix B: Chart | |||
| Service List |
Allowing the German Government-controlled Deutsche Post, with its monopoly on mail and other government subsidies, unfettered access to the domestic U.S. market is not in the public interest, since it would undermine and contravene the stated basis for permitting foreign air-freight forwarders such access to the U.S. market. By effectively affording cabotage rights to a Government-controlled foreign monopoly, maintaining the grant of the license contradicts the underlying statutory goal of promoting competition that exists free of government intervention. As such, DHL-W's license to engage in interstate transportation within the U.S. should be cancelled.
Counsel: UPS and Kelly Drye, David Vaughan, 202.955.9864 and Wiley Rein, Fred Fielding, 202.719.7320
Hong Kong Fifth Freedom All-Cargo Proceeding
| OST-95-764 | January 18, 2001 | Hong Kong Fifth Freedom All-Cargo Proceeding | |
| Service List |
Virtually all of the carriers competing for the three U.S.-Hong Kong roundtrip fifth freedom all-cargo frequencies agree that the Department must institute a comparative selection proceeding in order to fairly allocate the frequencies. The scope and procedures governing the proceeding remain to be determined. With the exception of Northwest, which alone believes that the record stands largely complete -- an assertion which Polar and others strongly contest -- the remaining applicants generally agree that evidence requests, exhibits, rebuttal exhibits, and possibly briefs are in order.
Under the UPS proposal, the Hong Kong frequencies would remain unused for nearly three additional months, a delay that is both unnecessary and harmful to U.S. interests. Indeed, Polar believes that Evergreen's proposed 80-day proceeding is twice as long as is necessary under the circumstances. Polar would urge the Department to reject any unnecessary delay.
UPS has also proposed two Information Requests that would paper the record with reams of unnecessary information. The Department should similarly decline to entertain this delaying tactic. The Information Request previously used in this docket was sufficient then, and it remains so today. Polar would urge the Department to move forward with a focused, straightforward and expeditious proceeding that will produce a record demonstrating the highest and best use of the available frequencies.
Counsel: Polar and Wilmer Cutler, Jeffrey Manley, 202-663-6670, jmanley@wilmer.com
| OST-98-4435 | Filed December 27, 2000 Issued January 17, 2001 |
U.S.- Iceland |
By: Paul Gretch
Los Angeles-San Jose del Cabo Exemption Proceeding
| Order 01-1-11 OST-00-8361 |
Issued January 18, 2001 Served January 18, 2001 |
Los Angeles- San Jose del Cabo Exemption Proceeding | |
| Appendix A: Standard Exemption Conditions |
By this order we make final our tentative decision in Order 2000-11-23 to select American Airlines, Inc. (American), to provide foreign scheduled air transportation services between Los Angeles, California, and San Jose del Cabo, Mexico, with its own aircraft, pursuant to exemption authority.
By: Susan McDermott
| OST-00-8015 | January 17, 2001 | Scheduled Commuter Passenger Operations |
By: Patrica Thomas
Prohibition on Deceptive Practices in the Marketing of Airfares to the Public Using the Internet
| January 18, 2001 | Deceptive Practices in the Marketing of Airfares to the Public Using the Internet |
The Department has provided interpretive guidance on the rule and, through a number of enforcement-related consent orders, has recognized certain exceptions to the "'full fare" advertising standard. In accordance with this enforcement case precedent, the Department has allowed taxes and fees collected by carriers and other sellers of air transportation, such as passenger facility charges (PFCs) and departure taxes, to be stated separately in fare advertisements so long as the charges are levied by a government entity, are not ad valorem in nature, are collected on a per-passenger basis, and their existence and amount are clearly indicated in the advertisement so that the consumer can determine the full fare to be paid.
By: Samuel Podberesky
Steven Wilson d/b/a Air Excursions, d/b/a Chilkat Aviation
| OST-99-5948 | January 18, 2001 | Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - Interstate Scheduled | |
| Attachments: Financials |
By: Air Excursions, Mike Loverink
| OST-00-8562 | January 18, 2001 | Hanoi-Ho Chi Min City - Los Angeles-San Francisco via Taipei Codeshare | |
| Attachment 1: Certificate of Insurance | |||
| Attachment 2: Agreement | |||
| Attachment 3: Certification | |||
| Attachment 4: Person Responsible for Financial Statements | |||
| Service List |
By this supplement, Vietnam Airlines is providing the following additional information and documents relating to Vietnam Airlines' application.
One minor point of correction and clarification should be noted regarding the text and Exhibit 1 of Vietnam Airlines' application. Vietnam Airlines currently serves 19 major international cities, in addition to over a dozen destinations in Vietnam. It is not presently serving Beijing, the twentieth destination named in the application and exhibit.
Counsel: Hogan Hartson, George Carneal, 202.637.6546, gucarneal@hhlaw.com
Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century
| OST-00-7175 | January 18, 2001 | LaGuardia Regional Jet; LaGuardia- Ithaca, NY | |
| Exhibit A: LGA Air 21 Slot Schedule | |||
| Service List |
As set forth in the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A, US Airways Express Carriers intend to operate all 20 Air-21 slots for service from LaGuardia to the following airports, each of which qualifies as a non-hub or small hub airport as determined under the FAA's Primary Airport Enplanement Activity Summary for Calendar Year 1997 (see 49 U.S.C. § 41714(h)(7) and 49 U.S.C. § 41714(h)(8)): Albany (NY), Burlington (VT), Charleston (SQ, Charlottesville (VA), Greenville/Spartanburg (SQ, Harrisburg (PA), Hyannis (MA), Ithaca (NY), Lebanon (NH), Manchester (NH), Martha's Vineyard (MA), Nantucket (MA), Norfolk (VA), Richmond (VA), and Syracuse (NY). These services will be operated with Stage 3 aircraft (Dash-8, ERJ- 145, Saab 340 or Beech 1900), all of which have a certified maximum seating capacity of less than 71 passengers.
Counsel: O'Melveny Myers, Joel Burton, 202.383.5300
International Air Transport Association
| OST-01-8371 | January 18, 2001 | PTC COMP 0751 |
By: David O'Connor
Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day
© Copyright 2001 Airline Information Research, Inc. All rights reserved.