Hoiu© Copyright 2000 Airline Information Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day
OST Docket Filings for March 8, 2000 |
Last Updated 03/09/00 10:58 AM
Applications and Renewals:
Delta - U.S.- France Renewal | IATA (2) | U.S.- Airways - Pittsburgh- Paris | Northwest - US-France Renewal | United - US-France Renewal | Winnport - U.S.- Canada
Answers and Replies:
American/British - Motion for Confidential Treatment | Continental - Answer of JetBlue | CRS - Reply of United | Delta/Aeromexico - Notification
U.S.-China - UPS Revised Exhibits
Notices of Action Taken:
Aeromexico | Aviones | Taxi Aereo
Notices and Orders:
UPS/Challenge - Show Cause
Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
| OST-96-1950 | Filed February 15, 2000 Issued March 8, 2000 |
Los Angeles, California- Culiacan, Mexico |
By: Paul Gretch
American Airlines, Inc. and British Airways, PLC.
| OST-99-6507 | March 8, 2000 | Form 41; Schedule B-7 |
American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.39, hereby moves that the Department withhold certain proprietary and commercially sensitive confidential information from public disclosure. Specifically, American is submitting a revised response to Item 7 (traffic and revenue forecast) of the Department's evidence request of December 14, 1999, as modified by Order 2000-1-8, January 7, 2000. The revision is necessary to correct certain anomalies in the original submission that American made on behalf of both applicants on January 19, 2000.
Counsel: American, Carl Nelson, 202.496.5647, carl_nelson@amrcorp.com
| OST-96-2038 | Filed February 18, 2000 Issued March 8, 2000 |
U.S.- Mexico Charters |
Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the applicant to continue to conduct passenger charter operations between Mexico and the United States, and other passenger charter operations in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212, using small equipment.
By: Paul Gretch
Computer Reservations System (CRS) Regulations
| OST-97-2881 | March 8, 2000 | CRS Regulations | |
| Service List |
In urging the Department to retain the current mandatory participation rule and definition of the term "system owner," Amadeus principally relies on the argument that the rule is needed to prevent airlines with more than a de minimis equity interest in a system from distorting airline and CRS competition by discriminating in favor of the CRS in which they hold an interest over other CRSs. See e.g., Amadeus Supplemental Reply at 3. Amadeus also argues that a new five-year technology agreement between United and Galileo announced on December 13, 1999, demonstrates that United should continue to be subject to the mandatory participation rule as a system owner. Finally, Amadeus contends that the Department rejected a control test for defining the term "system owner" when it adopted the mandatory participation rule in 1992, and argues that the changes in system ownership discussed in United's Supplemental Comment provide no basis for changing the definition.
Amadeus's defense of the mandatory participation rule and support for the current definition of the term system owner are both predictable and unpersuasive. Amadeus supports these rules, not because they are currently needed to protect airline competition, but because they limit the need for CRS vendors, including Amadeus, to compete with each other over the terms they offer for system participation, including booking fees.
Counsel: United and Wilmer Cutler, Bruce Rabinovitz, 202-663-6960
| OST-00-6996 | March 8, 2000 | Houston-New York JFK | |
| Service List |
While JetBlue vigorously supports increased competition in the airline industry,
especially by other low fare new entrants, the application of Continental for two new entrant exemption slots at JFK for flights to and from Houston, Texas is neither supported nor opposed by JetBlue. JetBlue does have reservations, however, about applications for JFK exemption slots not necessarily based on the particular merits of a specific request, but rather based upon both the operational availability of exemptions and full compliance with all environmental laws and regulations. The Department’s grant of this, or any other application for an exemption at JFK, without first requiring that the appropriate operational and environmental work be performed, including the assumption that JetBlue’s operations will utilize all 75 slots granted in Order 99-9-11, would set a disturbing precedent.JetBlue’s EA was based on the phase-in of an entire fleet consisting of thirty-two brand-new,
state-the-art Airbus A-320s with the most environmentally friendly engines available. Emission and noise assumptions contained in the EA were based upon JetBlue’s specific operating proposal. According to Continental’s application, their proposed service is to be provided with Stage 3 B-737 aircraft, with engines that are different from those used by JetBlue and analyzed in the EA. The environmental analysis performed to support the introduction of the A-320 into JFK is not equivalent to an analysis that assumes the introduction of a B-737 aircraft. Even though Continental’s request is only for two slots at JFK, the Department should not grant the application solely by relying on the environmental work performed by JetBlue, especially in such a noise and emissions sensitive region as Queens, New York.Counsel: Dow Lohnes, Jonathan Hill, 202.776.2000
| OST-98-3740 | March 8, 2000 | U.S.- France | |
| Service List |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. hereby applies for renewal of an exemption under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 to allow Delta to continue to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in France, either directly or via intermediate points, and beyond France to any point or points in third countries; and to allow Delta to continue to integrate this authority with Delta’s existing certificate and exemption authority.
Counsel: Delta and Shaw Pittman, Alexander Van der Bellen, 202-663-8060
Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Aerovias de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
| OST-00-7022 | March 8, 2000 | Las Vegas- Hermosillo | |
| Service List |
Counsel: Delta and Shaw Pittman, Alexander Van der Bellen, 202-663-8060
| OST-98-3760 | March 8, 2000 | US-France |
Northwest seeks renewal of its exemption to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail between any point or points in the United States, and any point or points in France, directly and via intermediate points, and beyond France to any point or points in third countries, and to integrate this authority with Northwest's other certificate and exemption authority. Northwest operates daily Detroit-Paris flights, and provides code-share service in the U.S.-France market in conjunction with its tripartite alliance with KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane-S.P.A., via Amsterdam, the Netherlands and Rome and Milan, Italy, respectively.
Counsel: Northwest, Megan Rae Rosia, 202-842-3193
Taxi Aereo de Veracruz, S.A. de C.V.
| OST-96-1909 | Filed December 3, 1999 Issued March 8, 2000 |
U.S.- Mexico Charters |
Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the applicant to continue to conduct passenger charter operations between Mexico and the United States, and
other passenger charter operations in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212, using small equipment, for a period of one year.
By: Paul Gretch
| OST-98-3732 | March 8, 2000 | U.S.-France | |
| Service List |
By Order 98-6-5, the Department granted United's exemption authority to operate scheduled combination services between, inter alia, any point or points in the United States, and any point or points in France, directly and via intermediate points, and beyond France to any point or points in third countries. The exemption authority was granted May 8, 1998, for a period of two years, and is currently set to expire on May 8, 2000. Renewal of United's authority is clearly in the public interest. This expanded U.S.-France route authority allows United to offer service code-share service between the U.S. and additional points in France pursuant to its alliance with Lufthansa. Such alliances offer additional online service choices to points in France and provide important competition with other alliances serving the U.S.-France market, particularly that of Delta and Air France.
Counsel: United and Wilmer Cutler, Jeffrey Manley, 202-663-6670
United Parcel Service Co. and Challenge Air Cargo, Inc.
| Order 00-3-2 OST-96-1379 OST-98-4277 OST-99-5046 OST-99-6345 |
Issued March 7, 2000 | |
Transfer of Route Authority - US-Latin America All-Cargo Service |
| Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity |
|||
| Attachment: Terms, Conditions and Limitations |
We tentatively find that the route transfer meets our standards for approval. Specifically, the introduction of UPS' service will provide new service options to the shipping public, more fully use our bilateral route opportunities and enhance competition in the U.S.-Latin America all-cargo market. In these circumstances, we tentatively conclude that approval of the transfer will benefit the public and will not conflict with our international aviation objectives.
We also tentatively find that both carriers will remain fit to provide their authorized services and that the transfer of Challenge's Latin America route authority to UPS will have a positive impact on the viability-of both carriers- Challenge will benefit from the, infusion of new capital to support its future plans. UPS will benefit from the ability to expand its operations to new markets, improving its competitive posture. The improvement in each carrier's viability will enable each carrier to compete more effectively and thereby enhances competition in the airline industry.
Furthermore, we tentatively find that there will be a positive impact on the U.S. trade position in the international air transportation market as a result of this transfer. Since UPS has a much more extensive route network and worldwide infrastructure than Challenge, UPS will able to provide more effective competition to both foreign carriers and other U.S. carriers in the U.S.-Latin America market. In these circumstances, air commerce between the United States and Latin America should increase, improving the U.S. trade position.
By: Bradley Mims
| OST-97-3034 | March 8, 2000 | Pittsburgh- Paris | |
| Service List |
US Airways currently provides daily, nonstop widebody service between Pittsburgh and Paris, as well as between Philadelphia and Paris. In April, US Airways will inaugurate Charlotte-Paris service. US Airways' Pittsburgh-Paris service has been well received and strongly supported by local and connecting traffic.
Counsel: O'Melveny Myers, Joel Burton, 202.383.5300
U.S.-China Air Services (2001)
| OST-99-6323 | March 8, 2000 | U.S.-China Air Services 2001 | |
| Errata Sheet for Exhibits | |||
| Exhibits (Revised): UPS-1150, 1203 to 1215, 1250, 1251, 1260, 1301 |
Counsel: UPS and Kelly Drye, David Vaughan, 202-955-9600
| OST-00-7055 | March 8, 2000 | U.S.- Canada Charters | |
| Exhibit 1: Information for Department | |||
| Exhibit 2: Web Page Description of Application | |||
| Exhibit 3: Balance Sheet | |||
| Exhibit 4: Projected Income Statement | |||
| Exhibit 5: Affidavit |
Winnport is a flag carrier of Canada, headquartered in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and is substantially owned and effectively controlled by Canadian nationals. It currently operates a Boeing 727- 100 freighter aircraft within Canada to provide ad hoc and program charters. Winnport also desires to expand its operations into the United States, initially providing on-demand, weekend service between Canada and the United States.
Counsel: Verner Liipfert, John Meitus, 202.371.6000
International Air Transport Association
| OST-00-7043 | March 8, 2000 | PTC12 NMS-AFR 0078 | |
| Memorandum: PTC12 NMS-AFR 0078 | |||
| Memorandum: Part 2 | |||
| Service List |
By: David O'Connor
| OST-00-7044 | March 8, 2000 | PTC2 EUR-AFR 0099 | |
| Memorandum: PTC2 EUR-AFR 0099 | |||
| Memorandum: Part 2 | |||
| Memorandum: Part 3 | |||
| Memorandum: Part 4 | |||
| Memorandum: Part 5 | |||
| Service List |
By: David O'Connor
Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day
© Copyright 2000 Airline Information Research, Inc. All rights reserved.