Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day
OST Docket Filings for February 23, 1999 |
Last Updated 02/24/99 11:20 AM
Applications and Renewals:
Fine Air and Arrow - Approval of Route Transfer | IATA | Nolinor
Answers and Replies:
Notices of Action Taken:
Notices and Orders:
Reno Air / America West - O'Hare Slots | Trans International Express | 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case
| OST-98-4825 | Filed December 1, 1998 Issued February 23, 1999 |
Mexico - U.S. |
Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the applicant to conduct passenger and/or cargo charter operations between Mexico and the United States, and other charter operations in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212, using small equipment.
By: Paul Gretch
Fine Air Services Corp. and Arrow Air, Inc.
| OST-99-5140 | February 23, 1999 | Route Transfer Authority | ||
| Tab A: Arrow's International Route Authority | ||||
| Tab B: Fine's International Route Authority | ||||
| Service List |
The only restricted-entry markets where Fine Air and Arrow both hold DOT authority are Colombia and Ecuador. However, as in the case of Peru, Fine Air does not hold authority from the Colombian authorities due to the bilateral situation and does not operate there. Arrow does operate scheduled all-cargo service to Colombia in competition with Federal Express, Challenge, Atlas and AIA plus TAMPA, as well as the substantial belly capacity offered by the U.S. and foreign combination carriers. The only restricted-entry market route held by Arrow alone is the Buenos Aires, Argentina - Miami, Florida route and companion weekly frequency allocations However, it is the Joint Applicant's understanding that the Government of Argentina has effectively agreed to deregulate all cargo services subject to reciprocity with individual foreign governments. It is Joint Applicant's further understanding that, as regards the U.S., the cargo open-entry issue remains pending due to the continuation of U.S. - Argentina negotiations aimed at an overall "open skies" agreement
Counsel: Allan Markham, 202-337-2149 for Arrow / Pierre Murphy, 202-872-1679, pmurphy@lopmurphy.com for Fine Air
Les Investissements Nolinor, Inc. d/b/a Nolinor Aviation and/or Nolinor
| OST-98-3641 | February 22, 1999 | U.S. - Canada | |
| Service List |
Applies for renewal of its exemption from 49 U.S.C. 40301 which authorizes Nolinor to engage in charter foreign air transportation of persons and their accompanying baggage and of cargo, with Convair 580 aircraft, between the United States and Canada and, subject to prior Department approval, between other countries and the United States. Nolinor also requests stopover privileges and renewal of its relief from the requirement to obtain advance approval for each Canada U.S. flight.
Counsel: Beauvais Truchon, Michel St.-Pierre, 418.692.4180
| OST-98-4164 | February 23, 1999 | Exemption from Economic Regulations |
Letter submitted by U.S. DOT/RSPA informing the Department that the company requires an
additional month in which
to complete the FAA certification process prior to instituting operations.
By: Patricia L. Thomas, Chief Air Carrier Fitness Division, Office of Aviation Analysis
Reno Air, Inc. / America West Airlines, Inc.
| Order 99-2-26 OST-97-2771 OST-99-5030 |
Issued and Served February 23, 1999 | High Density Rule - Chicago O'Hare |
By this Order, we are denying the motion of United Air Lines to reopen the record in Docket OST-97-2771 and reallocate to another qualified airline the slot exemptions now held by Reno Air. We dismiss the America West Airlines' application for slot exemptions in the Reno-Chicago-O'Hare market. Whether the Department exercises its discretion to rescind an award of slot exemptions depends on public interest considerations. Our public interest assessment of this case weighs in favor of allowing Reno Air to continue these operations. Among other things, the record indicates that withdrawal of these services by the Department would have a severe and adverse impact on the economy of Reno/Tahoe and the State of Nevada.
By: Charles Hunnicutt
Servicios Aereos Ilsa, S.A. de C.V. - SAILSA
| OST-96-1959 | Filed January 22, 1999 Issued February 23, 1999 |
Mexico - U.S. |
Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the applicant to continue to conduct passenger charter operations between Mexico and the United States, and other passenger charter operations in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212, using small equipment.
By: Paul Gretch
Tie Aviation, Inc., D/B/A Trans International Express
| Order 99-2-17 | February 23, 1999 | Fitness Determination - Commuter Air Carrier |
The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding that Tie Aviation, Inc. d/b/a Trans International Express is fit, willing, and able, to conduct scheduled passenger operations as a commuter air carrier.
By: Mrs. Kathy Lusby Cooperstein, Air Carrier Fitness Division
Transportes Aeros de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V. - TAMSA
| OST-96-1919 | Filed January 22, 1999 Issued February 23, 1999 |
Mexico - U.S. |
Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the applicant to continue to conduct passenger charter operations between Mexico and the United States, and other passenger charter operations in accordance with 14 CFR Part 212, using small equipment.
By: Paul Gretch
1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case
| Order 99-2-27 OST-98-4854 |
Issued and Served February 23, 1999 | US-Italy Combination Service Case | ||
| Appendix A: Summary of US-Italy Proposals |
By this Order, we tentatively select Delta Air Lines to operate seven weekly frequencies in the Atlanta-Rome market beginning April 1, 1999, and tentatively select US Airways for backup authority. Against this background, the record supports a tentative finding that we can derive major public benefits from an award in this case by providing for new gateway services to Italy. This consideration strongly supports Delta's Atlanta-Rome application because only Delta would open a new gateway to Italy, and only Delta would permit the Southern region of the country to enjoy the benefits of U.S.-carrier gateway services. Delta would also provide the most significant behind gateway service benefits and enhance competition in the U.S.-Italy market. In these circumstances, we have tentatively determined that Delta's proposal offers the best use of the route authority at issue. While American and US Airways have submitted attractive proposals, their proposals do not match the public benefits that would be available under Delta's
By: Patrick Murphy
International Air Transport Association
| OST-99-4964 | February 23, 1999 | Technical Correction | TC31 North and Central Pacific / Japan-North America, Caribbean Specified Fares Tables |
| OST-99-5736 | February 23, 1999 | Application for Approval of Agreements | TC2 Europe-Central Africa Expedited Resos |
| OST-99-5738 | February 23, 1999 | Application for Approval of Agreements | TC23/TC123 Europe-South East Asia Resolutions |
Counsel: IATA, David O'Connor, 202-624-2977
Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day