Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day

OST Docket Filings for February 17, 1999

Last Updated 02/18/99 01:25 PM

NPRM on Wheelchair/Handicap Added

Applications and Renewals: 

Antair | TWA - St. Louis-Tokyo Dormancy

Answers and Replies: 

American/Finnair - Suppl Answer of United | Continental - US-Russia Suppl Answer of United

Russia Airlines - Motion of United to Dismiss | Unfair Exclusionary Practices - Meeting w/ United in Sept 98

Notices of Action Taken:

Northwest - South American Codeshare w/ Continental | TAESA | TWA (2)

Notices and Orders:

NPRM: Disability in Air Travel | Travel Group et al


American Airlines, Inc. / American Airlines, Inc. and Finnair Oyj

OST-98-4328
OST-98-4522
Undocketed
February 17, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Supplemental Consolidated Answer of United Air Lines and Motion for Leave to File Chicago-Moscow; US-Riga/Tallin/St. Petersburg

In its application, United referred to the current code-share services to Moscow operated by Northwest and KLM and attached a schedule showing 10 weekly flights. United has been advised by Northwest that, in light of the provisions of the new U.S./Russia MOU which limit such code-share services to no more than 7 flights per week in any city pair, Northwest has amended its code-share schedule accordingly. Thus, United now understands that in Northwest's current schedule that carrier is holding out only 7 weekly code-share flights between Amsterdam and Moscow. In these circumstances, given the schedule changes implemented by both Northwest and Delta (see footnote 4 of United's Consolidated Answer), it appears that neither carrier intends to seek the right to continue operations in excess of those allowed under the new U. S./Russia MOU. There may be no need, therefore, to address the issue raised in section 4 of United's Consolidated Answer since that issue has apparently already been addressed and resolved by Northwest and Delta.

Counsel:  United and Kirkland Ellis, Jeffrey Manley, 202-879-5161, jeffrey_manley@kirkland.com

Index


Antair S.A. de C.V.

OST-96-1928 February 10, 1999
Docketed February 17, 1999
pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Application for Renewal of Exemption Mexico-US Charter

Antair S.A. de C.V. hereby applies for renewal of its exemption from 49 U.S.C. 40301 which authorizes Antair to engage in private transportation of persons between the United States and Mexico. Antair also requests continuation of its stopover privileges and renewal of relief from any requirement to obtain advance approval for each Mexico U.S. flight. The Department originally granted the above authority to Antair effective January 7, 1997, and renewal of such authority was effected on February 17, 1998. Antair requests that this authority, which is scheduled to expire February 17, 1999, be renewed for a period of at least one year.

Counsel:  Robert Givens, 713-932-1540

Index


Continental Airlines, Inc.

OST-99-5049 February 17, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Supplemental Answer of United Air Lines and Motion for Leave to File US-Russia Codesharing with Air France

In its application, United referred to the current code-share services to Moscow operated by Northwest and KLM and attached a schedule showing 10 weekly flights. United has been advised by Northwest that, in light of the provisions of the new U. S./Russia MOU which limit such code-share services to no more than 7 flights per week in any city pair, Northwest has amended its code-share schedule accordingly. Thus, United now understands that in Northwest's current schedule that carrier is holding out only 7 weekly code-share flights between Amsterdam and Moscow.  In these circumstances, given the schedule changes implemented by both Northwest and Delta (see footnote 4 of United's Answer), it appears that neither carrier intends to seek the right to continue operations in excess of those allowed under the new U.S./Russia MOU. There may be no need, therefore, to address the issue raised in section 4 of United's Answer since that issue has apparently already been addressed and resolved by Northwest and Delta.

Counsel:  United and Kirkland Ellis, Jeffrey Manley, 202-879-5161, jeffrey_manley@kirkland.com

Index


Northwest Airlines, Inc.

OST-98-4833 Filed December 1, 1998
Issued February 17, 1999
pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Notice of Action Taken Service Between Newark/Houston and South America Code-Sharing with Continental

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail between Newark, New Jersey, on the one hand, and Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo, Brazil; Bogota, Colombia; Quito and Guayaquil,Ecuador; Lima, Peru; and Caracas, Venezuela, on the other; and between Houston, on the one hand, and Bogota, Colombia; Quito and Guayaquil, Ecuador; Lima, Peru; and Caracas, Venezuela, on the other. Northwest intends to operate this service pursuant to a code-share arrangement with Continental Airlines.

By:  Paul Gretch

Index


Notice of Proposed Rulemaking - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Air Travel; Compensation for Damage to Wheelchairs and Other Assistive Devices

OST-99-5099 February 17, 1999 pdficon1.gif (224 bytes)Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Notice of Proposed Rulemaking - Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Air Travel; Compensation for Damage to Wheelchairs and Other Assistive Devices

The Department is proposing to amend its rules implementing the Air Carrier Access Act of 1986 to lift an existing cap on the amount of compensation airlines would have to pay to passengers for loss or damage of their wheelchair users and other assistive devices. The proposal is intended to provide additional relief to passengers using expensive assistive devices when they are destroyed or seriously damaged in the course of airline travel. Comments are requested by May 18, 1999. Late-filed comments will be considered to the extent practicable.

By:  Robert C. Ashby

Index


Policy Statement Regarding Unfair Exclusionary Practices

OST-98-3713 September 7, 1998
Docekted February 17, 1999
pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Meeting Summary of September 7, 1998 with United Airlines Policy Statement Regarding Unfair Exclusionary Practices - Statement of Enforcement Policy Regarding Unfair
Exclusionary Conduct

United believes that the Department and the industry have two different versions of the future. The Department’s public statements indicate a belief that the industry is moving toward being dominated by a few big airlines. The industry, on the other hand, sees the large airlines as struggling for success and having a shrinking market share, unlike airlines like Southwest. Southwest has had a much higher growth rate than the overall industry. Southwest is the largest monopolist today - it has more monopoly markets than the big six airlines combined.  The dialogue has not worked because the Department and the industry interpret existing facts so differently. United thinks there have been a number of industry efforts to achieve a dialogue that have not been successful.

By:  DOT

Index


Russia Airlines

OST-98-4289 February 17, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Motion of United Air Lines to Dismiss Answer Exemption - Russia-US

Hereby requests the Department to dismiss its answer dated August 4, 1998, in the above-captioned proceeding. In that answer, United opposed the application of Russia Airlines for exemption authority to offer scheduled service in the New York-Moscow market. Because of recent developments in U.S./Russia and Germany/Russia bilateral aviation relations, the basis for United's opposition no longer exists and it is hereby withdrawn.

Counsel:  United and Kirkland Ellis, Jeffrey Manley, 202-879-5161, jeffrey_manley@kirkland.com

Index


Transportes Aereos Ejecutivos, S.A. de C.V.

OST-99-5037 Filed January 22, 1999
Issued February 17, 1999
pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Notice of Action Taken All-Cargo Service Between Cancun-Los Angeles

Relief requested: Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the applicant to conduct scheduled, all-cargo service between Cancun, Mexico, and Los Angeles, California.

By:  Paul Gretch

Index


Trans World Airlines, Inc.

OST-98-3419 February 17, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Application for a Waiver Waiver of the Dormancy Condition Applicable to its St. Louis-Tokyo Frequency Allocation
    Service List  

TWA had hoped to start service on the route on June 1, 1999. as it initially proposed. However, its attempts to acquire slots at Narita for the proposed service were unsuccessful. Moreover, the downturn in the Asian economies has had a significant impact on international trade between the United States and Japan and the Far East. Due to the changed economic conditions, and its inability to acquire the necessary slots, TWA has determined that it will not be feasible to institute St. Louis-Tokyo service as originally planned.

Counsel:  TWA and Richard Fahy, 703-684-4422, rfahy@ibm.net

Index


Trans World Airlines, Inc

OST-97-2292 Filed January 19, 1999
Issued February 16, 1999
pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Notice of Action Taken Service Between                  St. Louis-Mexico and Montego Bay

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail between (1) the terminal point St. Louis, Missouri, and the terminal point Cancun, Mexico; (2) the terminal point St. Louis, Missouri, and the terminal point Puerto Vallarta, Mexico; (3) the terminal point St. Louis, Missouri, and the terminal point Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Mexico; and (4) the terniinal point St. Louis, Missouri, and the terminal point Montego Bay, Jamaica.

By:  Paul Gretch

OST-99-5066 Filed February 3, 1999
Issued February 17, 1999
pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Notice of Action Taken Route Integration for Routes 147, 164, 468, 680 and 755

Integrate its existing authority to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail under its certificates of public convenience and necessity for Routes 147, 164, 468, 680, and 755, and under its currently held exemptions, so as to permit foreign air transportation services involving any points named on the above certificates and exemptions.

By:  Paul Gretch

Index


Travel Group, Inc. d/b/a Republic Air Travel and Scot Spencer / Airlift Group, Inc.and Richard Bernard / Express One International

OST-95-272
49233
February 16, 1999 pdficon.gif (87 bytes)Order Extending Procedural Dates Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive Practices
    Service List  

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Motion by Respondents Scot Spencer and Travel Group, Inc. d/b/a Republic Air Travel and the Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (Enforcement Office) for an extension of time from February 16, 1999, to March 16, 1999, for the parties to submit separate or joint recommendations of a proposed hearing date (or a proposed settlement) in this Enforcement Proceeding, and the entire record herein, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the date by which Respondents Scot Spencer and Travel Group, Inc. d/b/a Republic Air Travel and the Enforcement Office are required to submit separate or joint recommendations of a proposed hearing date (or a proposed settlement) in this Enforcement Proceeding is hereby extended until March 16, 1999.

By:  Ronnie Yoder

Index


Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day