Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day
OST Docket Filings for February 2, 1999 |
Last Updated 02/04/99 12:02 PM
Reason Foundation Policy Study Added in Predatory
Practices
Braathens and Daystar Exhibits Added 2/4
Air Carrier Association Comments on The High Density Rule
- Listed in FAA Rules Docket As Well
Applications and Renewals:
American - Motion for Immediate Action Codeshare w/ Finnair & Chicago-Moscow
Braathens - Cooperative Marketing Agreement
Daystar - West Indies | IATA - CRS Carrier Selection | Inland Aviation Services
Answers and Replies:
Unfair Exclusionary Practices - Reason Foundation | US-Italy - Letters in Support of Delta's Service
Notices of Action Taken:
None
Notices and Orders:
Mesa/America West Express - Gallup, NM | IATA | Sun Jet - Order to Show Cause
| OST-98-4522 | February 2, 1999 | US-Riga/Tallinn/St. Petersburg via Helsinki; Codeshare with Finnair |
Under the American/Finnair agreement, as amended, the "AA" code will be displayed on one daily Finnair flight between Helsinki and St. Petersburg, and on one daily Finnair flight between Helsinki and Moscow. These flights will connect with Finnair's flights between New York (JFK) and Helsinki, which will also display the "AA" code. Under the U.S.-Russia Civil Air Transport Agreement, as amended on January 22, 1999, each codeshare flight requires half a frequency (Paragraph 2, Section 2, Annex V). Accordingly, the seven frequencies that American now holds for Chicago-Moscow service (and is seeking to amend by motion in OST-98-4328) are sufficient for the 14 weekly codeshare frequencies that American and Finnair propose to operate to St. Petersburg and Moscow.
Granting exemption authority to American to serve St. Petersburg, as requested herein, will enable the Department to promote codesharing between the United States and Russia under the new U.S.-Russia bilateral aviation agreement. American will be able to compete for the first time with U.S. and Russian carrier services and with U.S.-Russia codesharing arrangements involving other carriers. By authorizing American to codeshare with Finnair between the U.S. and Russia, the Department will maximize the services available to the public, and make available a wide range of service options pursuant to the expanded bilateral regime. Because American and Finnair will price their services independently, American will bring additional competition to U.S.-Russia routes now served by Finnair and other airlines. Because American intends to commence the proposed codesharing services as promptly as possible, we ask that the Department grant the required authority on an expedited basis to enable American to engage in necessary advance sales and marketing activities.
| OST-98-4328 | February 2, 1999 | Chicago-Moscow |
American Airlines, Inc. hereby moves to amend its exemption and allocation of seven weekly U.S.-Russia combination frequencies for Chicago-Moscow service, granted by Notice of Action Taken in this docket on September 18, 1998, so as to enable American to serve Moscow from U.S. points, and to use the frequencies for third-country codesharing to Moscow and St. Petersburg via Helsinki, Finland, under an arrangement with Finnair Oy.
Counsel: American, Carl Nelson, 202-496-5647, carl_nelson@amrcorp.com
| OST-99-5053 | February 2, 1999 | Codesharing w/Northwest | |
| Cooperative Marketing Agreement | Dated January 26, 1999 | ||
| Service List | |||
| Exhibits Added 2/3 | Exhibit A: Codeshare Markets | ||
| Exhibit B: Northwest/Braathens Frequent Flyer Agreement | Dated November 11, 1997 (Redacted) | ||
| Exhibit C: Schedule File Information | |||
| Exhibit D: Northwest/Braathens Special Prorate Agreement | |||
| Exhbit E: Irregular Operations Rule 80 B | |||
| Exhbit F: General Sales Representation Agreements | |||
| Exhibit G: CRS and DCS Objectives and Seamless Service | |||
| Exhbit H: Staff Contacts by Area of Responsibility | (Redacted) |
Enclosed for filing please find six copies of the cooperative marketing agreement between Northwest Airlines, Inc. and Braathens ASA. The agreement is being submitted in further support of Braathens' application for an exemption and statement of authorization to engage in certain codeshare operations. The agreement has been redacted to remove certain limited commercial information deemed not relevant by the Department of Transportation on prior occasions.
Counsel: Squire Sanders, Charles Donley II, 202.626.6600
| OST-99-5062 | February 2, 1999 | Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity | |
| Service List | |||
| Affidavit of Allen Haddadi | |||
| Exhibits Added 2/4 | Exhibit A: Index of Regulatory Requirements | ||
| Exhibit B: Affidavit of Citizenship | |||
| Exhibit C: Biographies of Key Personnel, including stock ownership | |||
| Exhibit D: Historical Financial Statements | |||
| Exhibit E: Description of Current Fleet | |||
| Exhibit F: Affidavit of Aircraft Compliance | |||
| Exhibit G: Authorities Currently Held | |||
| Exhibit H: Map of Area to Be Served | |||
| Exhibit I: Illustrative Service Proposal and Fuel Use Estimate | |||
| Exhibit J: Forecast Financial Results | |||
| Exhibit K: Corporate Certification | |||
| Exhibit L: Agreement 18900 | |||
| Exhibit M: Article from Airways magazine, August, 1997 issue |
Daystar was formed with the intent of providing scheduled air service between the islands of Nevis and St. Kitts, which together form the Federation of St. Christopher and Nevis. The island of St. Kitts receives scheduled air service from several carriers at the Basseterre airport, which has an 8,000' runway. The primary service at St. Kitts is American Eagle, which provides service to the U.S. points of San Juan, PR, and St. Thomas, USVI with ATR-42 and ATR-72 aircraft. Until recently, the Newcastle Airport, which serves Nevis, had a runway of only 2,000. This precluded service by larger aircraft, and necessitated service by aircraft such as the Islander. In 1994, Daystar requested information about applying for a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the U.S. Department of Transportation. Daystar is a U.S. carrier, and holds an Air Carrier Operating Certificate from the F.A.A.. The goal of gaining D.O.T. certification was to enable interline ticketing and baggage agreements with scheduled carriers serving St. Kitts, and American Airlines in particular. The response from the Office of Aviation Analysis in 1994 was that operations strictly between two points in a foreign country did not constitute "air transportation" within the meaning of the governing statute and regulations. Unless "air transportation" as so defined was involved, a certificate would not be issued.
In fall, 1998, a second letter was received from the Office of Aviation Analysis. This letter stated than Daystar was a U.S. air carrier, and was engaged in scheduled air service. The letter went on the say that approval by the U.S.D.O.T. is required in order to engage in scheduled service. According to the Director of Office of Aviation Analysis, the second letter was sent at the request of Assistant General Counsel Sam Podberesky. Mr. Podberesky said that his request was based on an opinion by the international division that Daystar was holding itself out for business in the United States by virtue of its Internet web site, and that it was assumed that more than a de minimus amount of Daystar's traffic was U.S. in origin or destination.
Daystar proposes to provide air service as described herein with aircraft currently in its fleet, including Britten-Norman BN-2 "Islander" aircraft
By: Allen Haddadi, President, Daystar, 869.469.9065
Inland Aviation Services, Inc.
| OST-98-3857 | February 1, 1999 | Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity | |
| Exhibit A: Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1998 | |||
| Exhibit B: Balance at 1st Natl Bank of Anchorage | |||
| Exhibit C: Flight Resume of Dean Nelsen, Chief Pilot |
Inland Aviation Services, Inc. submits this supplement to its application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing interstate scheduled air transportation pursuant to section 41 102 of Title 49 of the United States Code.
By: Eric Feige, Director of Operations, Inland, 907.675.4624
Mesa Airlines, Inc., d/b/a America West Express
| Order 99-2-16 OST-98-4706 |
February 2, 1999 | Essential Air Service at Gallup, New Mexico |
Order 99-2-16, soliciting proposals from air carriers interested in providing essential air service at Gallup, New Mexico. Also, requires Mesa Airlines, Inc., d/b/a America West Express (Mesa) to continue serving Gallup for a 30-day period, through March 5, 1999, or until replacement service is secured, whichever occurs first.
By: Charles Hunnicutt
Policy Statement Regarding Unfair Exclusionary Practices
| OST-98-3713 | January 29, 1999 Docketed February 2, 1999 |
"Airline Deregulation - The Unfinished Revolution" |
Ufair Exclusionary Practices |
By: Reason Foundation, Robert Poole, President, Los Angeles, CA
| Order 99-2-17 OST-98-3957 |
Issued and Served February 2, 1999 | Resume Interstate Charter Air Transportation Operations |
Sun Jet anticipates that its initial first-year operations will be very limited, involving the operation of a single 115-seat DC-9-32 aircraft in passenger charter services for public charter operators or sub-service flights for other direct air carriers needing lift. Sun Jet states that it expects that all of its operations will be conducted on an ACMI (aircraft, crew, maintenance. and insurance) basis.
By: Charles Hunnicutt
1999 U.S.-Italy Combination Service Case
| OST-98-4854 | February 2, 1999 | 1999 US-Italy Combination Service Case |
Enclosed for filing in the captioned proceeding are letters in support of the selection of Delta Air Lines, Inc. from Sen. Trent Lott; Sen. John Breaux; Senators Bob Graham and Connie Mack; James H. Hodges, Governor of South Carolina; Glenda E. Hood, Mayor of Orlando, FL; Jim Marshall, Mayor of Macon, GA; and John C. Gunny M.D., Honorary Consul of Italy for the States of Georgia and South Carolina.
Counsel: Shaw Pittman, Robert Cohn, 202-663-8000
Editor's Note: There are numerous other Letters in Support for all the other carriers - please refer to the DOT's DMS Web Site for letters not contained here.
International Air Transport Association
| Order 99-2-18 OST-98-4744 R-1 through R-9 |
Issued February 2, 1999 Served February 4, 1999 |
Ticketing Procedures for Western Africa | |
| Appendix |
The agreement consists of resolutions and recommended practices (R.P.'s) affecting passenger services. Most of the changes further refine existing ticket formats and ticketing procedures to facilitate the introduction of the euro align absorption of certain passenger expenses for travel wholly within Western Africa with actions already taken in Tariff Coordination Conference; and assigns additional form codes for automated miscellaneous charges orders (MCO's). These proposals involve non-substantive changes, essentially of a technical, editorial or administrative nature, to existing approved resolutions and recommended practices, and appear to be in conformity with our substantive policies and concerns. As such, they raise no public interest issues, and will be approved.
By: Charles Hunnicutt
Agreements Adopted by the International Air Transport Association
| OST-98-4893 | February 2, 1999 | Technical Correction | TC3 Within South East Asia Fares Tables |
| OST-98-4067 | February 2, 1999 | Technical Correction | TC2 Within Middle East Specified Fares Tables |
| OST-98-4870 OST-98-4229 |
February 2, 1999 | CRS - Carrier Selection | |
| OST-98-4827 | February 2, 1999 | HIP Check |
Carrier Selection is a system used by Computer Reservations Systems (CRSs) to select the carrier whose fares will be used to price any given fare component. It was introduced when the US' authorities determined that the legal tariffs filed with them for approval had to be in the carrier's name and not filed as 'IATA' fares. Consequently all fares to/from the USA had a 'carrier' designator attached to them. As a result of the US position it was necessary to determine how to price an itinerary when different carriers were involved and both had fares filed for the fare component. For example a routing NYC -TW- LON -BA- ATH. Both TW and BA have fares filed NYC-ATH and the question was which carrier should be selected to determine the fare to be charged. It was agreed that the carrier to be used for each fare component would be the 'overwater' carrier to/from USA while in TC1 it would be the fare of the carrier operating the sector to/from USA.
Counsel: IATA, David O'Connor, 202-624-2977
Home | OST Filings by Number | OST Orders and Notices | OST Filings by Carrier
OST Filings by
Proceeding | OST Filings by Day | Office of Intl Aviation Filings by Carrier | Office of Intl Filings by Day